We handle the legals Australia-wide, so you can focus on scaling up 🇦🇺😎 Learn More
Australia’s thriving startup ecosystem is built on innovation, agility, and attracting top-tier talent. With limited cash flow, startups often turn to equity compensation to align employees’ interests with long-term company growth. Two popular options—restricted stock vs stock options—offer distinct benefits, risks, and tax implications. This guide explores the nuances of both to help Australian startups make informed decisions about equity compensation.
Restricted stock refers to shares granted to employees, typically founders or early hires—subject to vesting schedules and transfer restrictions. Unlike fully vested shares, employees earn ownership over time, with the possibility of forfeiture if they leave the company before completing the vesting period.
Shares granted as restricted stock usually vest incrementally over time (e.g., over four years with a one-year cliff). Employees forfeit unvested shares if they leave the company early.
In Australia, Employee Share Scheme (ESS) rules apply to restricted stock. The tax is triggered when shares vest, based on their market value minus any payment made by the employee. ESS concessions may allow startups to defer tax for up to three years, which is an attractive option for many employees.
Even after shares vest, selling shares can be difficult, especially in private companies with limited secondary markets.
Stock options give employees the right (but not the obligation) to purchase shares at a predetermined price (the exercise price) after a vesting period. If the company’s value increases, employees can buy shares at a lower price than market value.
Set at the fair market value (FMV) when options are granted. As the company’s value rises, employees can exercise their options at a lower price and make a profit.
Stock options are taxed when exercised, based on the difference between FMV and the exercise price. After 2022 ESS reforms, eligible startups can allow tax deferral until shares are sold, making stock options more attractive.
If the company’s valuation drops below the exercise price, stock options can become worthless (“underwater options”).
Factor | Restricted Stock | Stock Options |
---|---|---|
Ownership | Immediate post-vesting. | Only after exercise |
Tax Timing | Taxed at vesting (FMV taxed as income) | Taxed at exercise (gain taxed as income) |
Liquidity | Limited by market availability post-vesting | Requires exercise and sale |
Risk | Shares lose value if the company declines | Options expire worthless if FMV < exercise price |
Employee Cost | Often minimal or nil | Must pay exercise price to acquire shares |
At pre-Series A, Australian startups often issue restricted stock due to low valuations and minimal tax implications.
After raising a $50 million Series B, startups typically switch to stock options (ISOs or NSOs) for new hires. This shift balances tax efficiency and dilution concerns:
Cake Equity’s 2024 report on Australian startups found 61% of employees value equity as a key motivator, yet many lack clarity on its worth.
For early-stage startups with lower valuations, restricted stock vs stock options can have significant tax implications. Restricted stock is often preferred because it typically incurs minimal taxes at the time of vesting, particularly when ESS concessions apply.
As a startup matures and its valuation increases, stock options become a more tax-efficient method of equity compensation. This allows employees to benefit from the future growth of the company without incurring immediate tax liabilities.
For Australian startups, setting the FMV for private companies is critical for ensuring compliance with taxation laws. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) requires independent valuations, which must be carried out by qualified valuers. Incorrect assessments of FMV can lead to penalties or legal issues.
Startups must comply with the ATO’s Employee Share Scheme guidelines, including disclosure requirements and ESS statements.
Equity compensation offers must adhere to the Corporations Act 2001, ensuring startups do not offer unlicensed financial services.
Clear vesting conditions, forfeiture clauses, and termination rules should be outlined in employment contracts to avoid misunderstandings.
The 2022 ESS reforms expanded access to tax deferrals for startups, simplifying the equity compensation process.
When choosing between restricted stock vs stock options for your startup, consider your company’s growth stage, valuation, and long-term objectives. Early-stage companies may find restricted stock an ideal solution, while growth-stage startups can leverage stock options for greater tax efficiency and employee engagement.
Final Tip: Work with Australian legal professionals to navigate the complexities of equity compensation and compliance with ESS rules. A well-crafted equity compensation plan helps attract and retain talent while promoting long-term company success.
If you’re considering stock options or restricted stock for your startup, our team can help you structure the right equity plan.